Majordomo-Workers: Re: U-ZO: Re: Security hole?

Majordomo-Workers
(June 2000)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: U-ZO: Re: Security hole?
From:	Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ math . uh . edu>
Date:	16 Jun 2000 12:58:05 -0500
To:	Marilyn Davis <marilyn @ deliberate . com>
Cc:	majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	Marilyn Davis's message of "Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:42:29 -0700 (PDT)"
References:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10006161040590.969-100000@deliberate.com>
User-agent:	Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5

>>>>> "MD" == Marilyn Davis <marilyn@deliberate.com> writes:

MD> Do you know anything about this patch?

Sure; it implements stateful confirmation.

MD> Might it help you? 

Not me, but if need to stick with Mj1 and you are concerned about the
security of the stock majordomo auth tokens then you should be running it.

 - J<

Follow-Ups:

Re: U-ZO: Re: Security hole?
From: Marilyn Davis <marilyn@deliberate.com>

References:

Re: U-ZO: Re: Security hole?
From: Marilyn Davis <marilyn@deliberate.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: U-ZO: Re: Security hole? From: Marilyn Davis <marilyn@deliberate.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: U-ZO: Re: Security hole? From: Marilyn Davis <marilyn@deliberate.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: U-ZO: Re: Security hole? From: Marilyn Davis <marilyn@deliberate.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: U-ZO: Re: Security hole? From: Marilyn Davis <marilyn@deliberate.com>