Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(July 2000)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: 1.94.5 < Majordomo < 2.0
From: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah @ sol . ccsf . cc . ca . us>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>
Cc: Majordomo Workers List <majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to: <20000717150556.A18340@risc.sps.mot.com>

On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Dave Wolfe wrote:

> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:05:56 -0500
> From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
> To: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us>
> Cc: Chan Wilson <cwilson@slurp.neu.sgi.com>,
>     "Brian L. Heess, VP Tech" <brian@thru.net>,
>     Brock Rozen <brozen@torah.org>,
>     Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>,
>     Majordomo Workers List <majordomo-workers@GreatCircle.COM>
> Subject: Re: 1.94.5 < Majordomo < 2.0
> 
> [ Joe R. Jah writes: ]
> > On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Dave Wolfe wrote:
> > > [ Joe R. Jah writes: ]
> > > > 
> > > > I know most Majordomo Workers are fully committed to MJ2; nevertheless, I
> > > > believe 1.9x will continue to predominate among Majordomo users until MJ2
> > > > is officially released.  Improvements in 1.9x benefits all supporters of
> > > > Majordomo.  After all, the more polished MJ1, the more anticipated MJ2;^) 
> > > > therefore, I respectfully request that you consider releasing 1.95.0 using
> > > > patches in:	ftp://sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us/majordomo-patches/1.94.5/
> [...]
> > > Is there really anything that justifies a new major version
> > > number? Why not just 1.94.6? I don't believe any of these address
> > 
> > I had assumed that point releases were for bug fix only.  1.94.6 is fine. 
> 
> You may be right. I'll leave it up to Chan.
> 
> > > the recent problem report re checking log directory permissions in
> > > config-test, do they? I think it raised a very legitimate concern.
> > 
> > I must have missed that report; do you think config-test.0 should address
> > those problems to be included in the next release?
> 
> More likely config-test.1. I didn't save the mail since I didn't have
> any plans to address the problem. Is there an on-line archive of
> Mj-workers that's kept up to date? Last time I checked Jason's, nothing
> new had been added for quite some time. The email archive can probably
> be "get"ed from GreatCircle.

You can find up-to-date archives here:

	http://greatcircle.com/lists/majordomo-users/archive.html

Unfortunately it is not searchable;(

Regards,

Joe
-- 
     _/   _/_/_/       _/            ____________    __o
     _/   _/   _/      _/       ______________     _-\<,_
 _/  _/   _/_/_/   _/  _/                   ......(_)/ (_)
  _/_/ oe _/   _/.  _/_/ ah       jjah@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us



Indexed By Date Previous: 1.94.5 < Majordomo < 2.0
From: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us>
Next: Re: 1.94.5 < Majordomo < 2.0
From: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: 1.94.5 < Majordomo < 2.0
From: Brock Rozen <brozen@torah.org>
Next: Re: 1.94.5 < Majordomo < 2.0
From: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com