Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(September 2000)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: setting umask for archives ...
From: Brock Rozen <brozen @ torah . org>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 16:31:09 +0200 (IST)
To: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ math . uh . edu>
Cc: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM, mj2-dev @ csf . colorado . edu
In-reply-to: <ufan1hkxqvm.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu>

On 7 Sep 2000 at 08:39, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote about "Re: setting umask...":

> BR> I don't think we should make this per-list.
> 
> What if I _don't_ want downloadable archives for a list?  We still have to
> keep them so the digests and such can be built.  So what do I do?  If
> they're always created mode 644 then I would call that a security issue.

You're right.

> BR> BUT, if we are going to let them do it, then we should allow these OR
> BR> the numbers. Simple translation table does the job...
> 
> Why?  What on earth does that buy you, besides even more work for poor SRE?

Well, I should be able to set them group writeable, if I want. And I am
certainly interested in that.

The words keep it simple, but I don't think they should come at the
expense of functionality.


-- 
Brock Rozen                                              brozen@torah.org




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: setting umask for archives ...
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Next: Re: setting umask for archives ...
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: setting umask for archives ...
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Next: Re: setting umask for archives ...
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com