Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(September 2000)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: The future of Majordomo
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy @ hub . org>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:41:21 -0300 (ADT)
To: Mills CP <C . P . Mills @ rmcs . cranfield . ac . uk>
Cc: "'majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com'" <majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM>, "'majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com'" <majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to: <219CCDDECA3AD31195CA00A024AD25503733D7@uxstaff.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk>


Note that Mj2 is more then just 'well on its way' ... I've been using it
productive for >6 months now and love it ... Jason et al haven't put out
any formal releases only because there is soooooo much they are wanting to
do that they are, I swear, trying to do it all and won't release until
then :)

If you want a copy of Mj2, go to http://www.hub.org/pub/Majordomo2, where
nightly snapshots are being genrated ... the feature set makes Majordomo
v1 look pale in comparison ...

On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mills CP wrote:

> Having only just started out trying to use majordomo, I probably don't share
> the same level of loyalty as some users on this list. However, I feel I need
> to question the future of majordomo. I myself have had problems getting
> majordomo to work, whether this was due to a conflict or a bug in either my
> OS or version of perl I do not know, but when mj stripped and processed the
> headers, the entire message was stripped as well meaning that no valid
> commands were found.
> 
> I managed to fix this to a fasion by completely rewritting the message
> handling code to use the Mail::Internet modules available for Perl.
> 
> I keep reading that version 2 is well on it's way, but refering to a book I
> have that was published I think in '94, it seems that Majordomo v2 was on
> it's way then too.
> 
> A colleague told me about an open source program distributed under the GPL
> called mailman which is currently in version 2.0beta6 which offered all the
> functionality or majordomo plus more. I downloaded it with the idea of
> looking at it and installed it. I must say that it is IMHO far superior to
> mj. It includes automatic digesting and archiving and even provides a web
> based interface to the configuration and management functions and the
> archive which can be viewed in a number of different ways. I think I will
> now use mailman as my MLM.
> 
> What I am trying to say, is that sure, mj seems like it is a good product,
> and given the wide spread use of it, I have no doubt that it is (when you
> can get it working), but unless it develops somewhat faster than it appears
> to be at the moment, then other products, e.g. mailman are clearly going to
> take the lead.
> 
> So come on guys, get on with it. Make majordomo a product I, as a MLM
> manager cannot afford to be without.
> 
> P.S.	Check out http://www.list.org/ for more information on mailman.
> 

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: The future of Majordomo
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>
Next: Re: The future of Majordomo
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: The future of Majordomo
From: SRE <eckert@climber.org>
Next: Re: The future of Majordomo
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com