On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > And, to your comment below ... if 99% of the users were to run and report
> > bugs on it, though, the other 1% would have a better idea of what
> > should/needs to be done or fixed :)
>
> I'm talking about things that go deeper than, and should be addressed
> earlier than, bugs: those of user fit, features, and usability, which
> can't really be grafted on.
See, what I'm talking about is ppl using Mj1 vs Mj2 ... Mj2 is 3 years
advanced over Mj1 in scaleability, features, usability and, in my opinion,
user fit since its now sooooo much easier to configure then Mj1 ...
Basically, all I'm saying is that if someone is going to compare different
MLM, compare the same level of technology ... dont' comopare something
that is currently being developed against something that is 3 years dead
...
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
