ftp://ftp.hub.org/pub/Majordomo2 ... sorry about that :(
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Sharon F. wrote:
> I got an error at that address. Could you double check it please?
>
> Thanks!
> Sharon
>
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
> On 9/28/00, at 4:44 PM, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> >Note that Mj2 is more then just 'well on its way' ... I've been using it
> >productive for >6 months now and love it ... Jason et al haven't put out
> >any formal releases only because there is soooooo much they are wanting to
> >do that they are, I swear, trying to do it all and won't release until
> >then :)
> >
> >If you want a copy of Mj2, go to http://www.hub.org/pub/Majordomo2, where
> >nightly snapshots are being genrated ... the feature set makes Majordomo
> >v1 look pale in comparison ...
> >
> >On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mills CP wrote:
> >
> >> Having only just started out trying to use majordomo, I probably don't share
> >> the same level of loyalty as some users on this list. However, I feel I need
> >> to question the future of majordomo. I myself have had problems getting
> >> majordomo to work, whether this was due to a conflict or a bug in either my
> >> OS or version of perl I do not know, but when mj stripped and processed the
> >> headers, the entire message was stripped as well meaning that no valid
> >> commands were found.
> >>
> >> I managed to fix this to a fasion by completely rewritting the message
> >> handling code to use the Mail::Internet modules available for Perl.
> >>
> >> I keep reading that version 2 is well on it's way, but refering to a book I
> >> have that was published I think in '94, it seems that Majordomo v2 was on
> >> it's way then too.
> >>
> >> A colleague told me about an open source program distributed under the GPL
> >> called mailman which is currently in version 2.0beta6 which offered all the
> >> functionality or majordomo plus more. I downloaded it with the idea of
> >> looking at it and installed it. I must say that it is IMHO far superior to
> >> mj. It includes automatic digesting and archiving and even provides a web
> >> based interface to the configuration and management functions and the
> >> archive which can be viewed in a number of different ways. I think I will
> >> now use mailman as my MLM.
> >>
> >> What I am trying to say, is that sure, mj seems like it is a good product,
> >> and given the wide spread use of it, I have no doubt that it is (when you
> >> can get it working), but unless it develops somewhat faster than it appears
> >> to be at the moment, then other products, e.g. mailman are clearly going to
> >> take the lead.
> >>
> >> So come on guys, get on with it. Make majordomo a product I, as a MLM
> >> manager cannot afford to be without.
> >>
> >> P.S. Check out http://www.list.org/ for more information on mailman.
> >>
> >
> >Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> >Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> >primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
|
|
