On 1 Oct 2000, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I agree fully. But now you're getting into the "refinements" stage where
> before we were in the "get some kind of web interface" stage. Keep
> bringing these kinds of things up, and keep a list if you like. Working on
> things like this would be a great way for someone who wants to contribute
> to get involved.
Cool.
I am willing to track a list for user interface requirements (yeah, yeah,
I know it's a domineering term, but it maps well to the input phase), and
serve as a focus for a simplified and task-oriented end-user and
administrative usage model. I know we won't get there in a single
release, but since it's what I do for a day-job, it's an area I can add
value.
Y'know, as of a month ago, I was totally over Mj2, even though I've been
following the -workers list for years. Since I've contemplated other
alternatives -- mailman, a few commercial products -- I see how well
things have been implemented here, and want to adopt Mj2. (Please count
this as a voice toward getting a 2.0 beta -- or even better in some ways,
an Mj2 1.0 beta -- out soon, despite the fact that I desperately need the
UI work to move ahead as well.) But it's going to take the simplification
of the UI to get there, and I'm ready to help.
--
ROGER B.A. KLORESE rogerk@QueerNet.ORG
PO Box 14309 San Francisco, CA 94114
"There is only one real blasphemy -- the refusal of joy!" -- Paul Rudnick
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
