Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(November 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Reg. Exp in address matching
From: Luis Michelena <uylug @ fmed . edu . uy>
Organization: Facultad de Medicina
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:08:33 -0300
To: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah @ sol . ccsf . cc . ca . us>
Cc: <majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0211061304070.25793-100000@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0211061304070.25793-100000@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us>
Reply-to: uylug @ fmed . edu . uy


Thanks, it seems what i need right now, but would like to now if the change I 
proposed would had worked also, because it seems a pretty minimalist change 
(that it seems to be covered by the help already, at least on the 
list-owner-info file, am I wrong?, it doesn't says it explicitly, but let the 
user understand it (I mean, it made me understand that)), and would help to 
get other things done, like letting people with the 'michel' text on the user 
side of the address (that would be my relatives ;) ).
    The patch you propossed works well with the munge domain option?
Regards,
        Luis Michelena

El Mié 06 Nov 2002 18:10, Joe R. Jah escribió:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Luis Michelena wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 17:12:49 -0300
> > From: Luis Michelena <uylug@fmed.edu.uy>
> > To: majordomo-workers@greatcircle.com
> > Subject: Reg. Exp in address matching
> >
> >
> > Reading in Majordomo help (on the list's owner doc) found that using
> > regexp was posible for some matchings, but when I tried to put a rule to
> > let everybody in a domain post to a list, it didn't work, then i found
> > reading the majordomo.pl file, on line 188 (in the definition of
> > addr_match) the line that follows:
> > return($a1[0] eq $a2[0]);
> >
> > so it doesn't let use regexp in address matching, I was thinking that
> > colud be better to use:
> > return($a1[0] =~ /^$a2[0]$/);
> >
> > Have made some test, and it seems to work fine, but I would like to know
> > if there is some problem in changing this (like security fouls or mal
> > function in some rare cases)
> > These test were made in majordomo-1.94.5.
> > Thank you for reading this lines, and please forgive my lousy english but
> > is not my mother tongue.
>
> You may want to use this patch:
>
>  ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/majordomo-patches/1.94.5/restrict2domain.0
>
> Please read the patch for more information.
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Reg. Exp in address matching
From: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us>
Next:
From: (nil)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Reg. Exp in address matching
From: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us>
Next:
From: (nil)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com