Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(March 2005)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Whether/how to address security issue with Majordomo 1.94.5?
From: Brent Chapman <Brent @ GreatCircle . COM>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:51:15 -0800
To: Daniel Liston <dliston @ sonny . org>
Cc: majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <422F7A91.20606@sonny.org>
References: <p06210253be551fd1924a@[66.92.48.19]><p06210254be55225a2a50@[66.92.48.19]> <422F7A91.20606@sonny.org>

At 4:37 PM -0600 3/9/05, Daniel Liston wrote:
>I would not mind moving into the role of release coordinator.

OK, that's an option I'll definitely consider.

If anybody wants to speak up for or against Dan taking over the role 
of release coordinator, please let me know your reasons ASAP; feel 
free to send me private email, if you'd rather not discuss it 
publicly.

>I can think of several of the unofficial patches that could
>be rolled in to make a dandy 1.94.6 release, as well as a few
>bug and security fixes and "unsupported" utilities. :)

Yeah, though we might also want to consider getting the security 
patch(es) out quickly as 1.94.6, and then following up with a feature 
release (perhaps 1.95?).  That would make it easy for folks to 
address just the security issue, without worrying about what new bugs 
might be introduced by the new features.

>If you do move the development effort to sourceforge, are you
>considering any changes to a GNU license?

I don't recall why I originally chose the TIS license (which is what 
I based the Majordomo license on, with their permission) rather than 
a GNU license.  If I recall correctly, the GNU license was nowhere 
near as well-established back then, and was just one of several "open 
source" (though that term hadn't come into use yet, I don't think) 
licenses that were floating around.

>Would greatcircle still host the mailing lists?

Yes, if necessary, though it might make sense to move them to 
Sourceforge as well (if that's a service they offer; I don't know). 
Nobody here is paying any attention to bounces or requests for 
approval on the Majordomo-* mailing lists.

>There were a couple years where I was intimately familiar with
>the inner workings of majordomo, and I still have a back burner
>project to make majordomo LDAP aware.  I intend to use an on/off
>switch for this feature, if I ever get time to finish it. :(
>
>I just don't want to see majordomo die of neglect, and I prefer
>the simplicity of 1.9x to the complexity of "][".

Noble sentiments.


-Brent
-- 
Brent Chapman <Brent@GreatCircle.COM>
Great Circle Associates, Inc.
http://www.greatcircle.com/
+1 650 962 0841


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Whether/how to address security issue
From: Brent Chapman <Brent@GreatCircle.COM>
Next: Re: Whether/how to address security issuewith Majordomo 1.94.5?
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Whether/how to address security issue with Majordomo 1.94.5?
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>
Next: Re: Whether/how to address security issue with Majordomo 1.94.5?
From: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com