Great Circle Associates Network-Automation
(April 2005)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: CLI transactions
From: David Magda <dmagda @ ee . ryerson . ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 10:59:35 -0400
To: j . schoenwaelder @ iu-bremen . de
Cc: Network Automation List <network-automation @ greatcircle . com>,Kirby Files <ksfiles @ gmail . com>
In-reply-to: <20050415203554.GA567@boskop.local>
References: <425FDB2E.8080502@gmail.com> <20050415203554.GA567@boskop.local>
Reply-to: David Magda <dmagda @ ee . ryerson . ca>


On Apr 15, 2005, at 16:35, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:

> P.S. The rollback capability in NetConf is optional and the list above
>      explains quite well why.

Does the current draft have it as a MAY or as a SHOULD? (Really have to 
go through the draft, but only so many hours in a day.)

Perhaps if they made it a MUST it would spur companies to actually deal 
with this. I would hope that the writers of the RFC would at least look 
to the future on where you want to go in addition to simply where we 
are now. (Yes I am being idealistic here. :)



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: CLI transactions
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Next: Re: CLI transactions
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: CLI transactions
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Next: Re: CLI transactions
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com