Great Circle Associates Network-Automation
(April 2005)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: CLI transactions
From: Andrew Fort <andrew . fort @ gmail . com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:32:32 +1000
To: network-automation @ greatcircle . com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BD8YL8D5yyviDLADkU+tIebVaL3X9aZmiagY7Qi3jo9ciAB+2jnKAIICufM5FJ3kAPhuH+3iRd066Ajcn/a3YpslvGB/GSzU957uTgXyRc3fjWTwsFrBPAbCL8s/UlAcGJDjPhVNNf7dH9U6iLB69UYmtZlXi72mSvbJonGr9Uk=
In-reply-to: <387B5A9BF31B5D43A2B18DD9F326B8E1018566A2@NJFPSRVEXG2KCL.research.att.com>
References: <387B5A9BF31B5D43A2B18DD9F326B8E1018566A2@NJFPSRVEXG2KCL.research.att.com>
Reply-to: Andrew Fort <andrew . fort @ gmail . com>

On 4/19/05, albert@research.att.com <albert@research.att.com> wrote:
> Hi Juergen,  Other than the castrophic cases you called attention to (and others we can think of where you lose the router or the ability to reset the router), could you elaborate on the cases you worry about where the simple policy of rollback to the last known good config does not converge to an acceptable state?
> -- Albert
> 
> Albert Greenberg

And given that there are already (large) operators that use the "see
you on the other side, hope your configuration updated!" to do major
changes with "reload soft" on cisco boxen, are any of these operators
on this list and would care to comment on the nature of such changes?

-andrew


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: CLI transactions
From: <albert@research.att.com>
Next: Re: CLI transactions
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: CLI transactions
From: <albert@research.att.com>
Next: Re: CLI transactions
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com